Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,414 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Audits results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 1,438 hits. Analysis detected 4,369 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,656 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠39% (9,703 of 15,778 topics). This Government Audits is better (less manipulative) than 61.50% of the peer group.
Government Audits
Topic details
Total words: 5,656
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

39% percentile
025507510038.5% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 25.4%25.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.4%0.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.3%0.3%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 8.2%8.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 25.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 9.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 4.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos