Topic summary
86% 1 analyzed article/video 672 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Government Accountability Office results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 41.4% saturation with 835 hits . Analysis detected 3,280 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,016 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6% and a BS Rank of 82% (2,905 of 15,785 topics). This Government Accountability Office is worse (more manipulative) than 81.60% of the peer group. Government Accountability Office
Topic details
Total words: 2,016
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.6% percentile 6.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 41.4% 41.4% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 16.8% 16.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 6.3% 6.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 4.1% 4.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 26.2% 26.2% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 7.7% 7.7% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.1% 1.1% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 5.0% 5.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 11.0% 11.0% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 3.5% 3.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 41.4%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Topic 16.8%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 26.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 1.9% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.0% Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.4% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.5%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.8%, sitewide 3.3% False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.1% Recency Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.5% Begging the Question: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.0% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0% Special Pleading: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst