Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 935 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gop Strategy results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Framing Effect , and Hasty Generalization , with Ad Hominem as the most egregious example at 14.1% saturation with 527 hits . Analysis detected 4,784 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,740 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.2% and a BS Rank of 55% (7,238 of 15,764 topics). This Gop Strategy is worse (more manipulative) than 54.10% of the peer group. Gop Strategy
Topic details
Total words: 3,740
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
54% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 54.1% percentile 3.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 10.6% 10.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Topic 14.1% 14.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.1% 2.1% False Dilemma Sitewide 1.5% Topic 10.0% 10.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 12.3% 12.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 0.5% 0.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 10.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 12.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 15.9% Ad Hominem: Topic 14.1%, sitewide 2.2% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 8.1% False Dilemma: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 1.5% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.5% Straw Man: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst