Topic summary
⁠29%2 analyzed articles/videos1,839 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Golden State Valkyries results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Self-Serving Bias, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 8.9% saturation with 412 hits. Analysis detected 2,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,626 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠27% (12,229 of 16,562 topics). This Golden State Valkyries is better (less manipulative) than 73.80% of the peer group.
Golden State Valkyries
Topic details
Total words: 4,626
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

26% percentile
025507510026.2% percentile
2.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.2%4.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.4%4.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 8.9%8.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.9%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.4%Begging the Question: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos