Topic summary
⁠68%1 analyzed article/video650 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gold Mining results contain 20 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Anchoring Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 147 hits. Analysis detected 1,174 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,950 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (7,695 of 15,447 topics). This Gold Mining is worse (more manipulative) than 50.20% of the peer group.
Gold Mining
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,950
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

50% percentile
025507510050.2% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.2%2.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.8%3.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.6%2.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 8.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 4.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%False Dilemma: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.3%Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos