Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 138 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Goats And Soda results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Bandwagon , and Ambiguity (Equivocation) , with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 28.7% saturation with 119 hits . Analysis detected 836 faulty-reasoning hits from 414 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.6% and a BS Rank of 92% (1,396 of 16,562 topics). This Goats And Soda is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group. Goats And Soda
Topic details
Total words: 414
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
92% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 91.6% percentile 9.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles414 analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 28.7% 28.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Topic 14.5% 14.5% Bandwagon Sitewide 2.2% Topic 15.2% 15.2% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Topic 12.8% 12.8% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 18.6% 18.6% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 11.3% 11.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 13.5% 13.5% Primacy Effect Sitewide 0.9% Topic 7.5% 7.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Appeal to Authority: Topic 28.7%, sitewide 11.1% Framing Effect: Topic 18.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Bandwagon: Topic 15.2%, sitewide 2.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 14.5%, sitewide 0.8% Anchoring Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 4.0% Optimism Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 6.0% Recency Bias: Topic 12.8%, sitewide 2.7% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 8.7%, sitewide 3.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1% Halo Effect: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 6.7% Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 7.5% Anecdotal: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 5.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 0.9% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 6.9% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 4.6% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.1% Begging the Question: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.7% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 0.4% Appeal to Authority Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst