Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Goal Setting results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Hasty Generalization, and Indoctrination, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 9.4% saturation with 299 hits. Analysis detected 2,038 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,188 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Goal Setting is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Goal Setting
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,188
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.4%5.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.8%3.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 9.4%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Indoctrination: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.0%, sitewide 0.8%Circular Reasoning: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.5%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos