Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video988 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Go Public results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 13.5% saturation with 534 hits. Analysis detected 3,535 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,952 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (8,523 of 16,494 topics). This Go Public is better (less manipulative) than 51.70% of the peer group.
Go Public
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 3,952
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

48% percentile
025507510048.3% percentile
2.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 13.5%13.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 7.2%7.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.0%2.0%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.6%2.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 10.0%10.0%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 11.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 10.0%, sitewide 7.5%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 8.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.9%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Begging the Question: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos