Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,352 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Wealth Report results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Negativity Bias, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 11.7% saturation with 633 hits. Analysis detected 5,443 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,408 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠60% (6,743 of 16,562 topics). This Global Wealth Report is worse (more manipulative) than 59.30% of the peer group.
Global Wealth Report
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠60%Global Wealth Report (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 5,408
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510059.3% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.9%7.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.4%0.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 3.9%3.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 7.4%7.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 11.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 5.3%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos