Topic summary
⁠72%2 analyzed articles/videos2,883 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Power Dynamics results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 14% saturation with 1,458 hits. Analysis detected 9,825 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,436 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,460 of 16,562 topics). This Global Power Dynamics is better (less manipulative) than 63.20% of the peer group.
Global Power Dynamics
Topic details
Total words: 10,436
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

37% percentile
025507510036.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.1%12.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.2%2.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos