Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video767 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Mobility results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Appeal to Authority, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 286 hits. Analysis detected 3,073 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,068 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠57% (6,902 of 15,949 topics). This Global Mobility is worse (more manipulative) than 56.70% of the peer group.
Global Mobility
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠57%Global Mobility (selected)4%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 3,068
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

57% percentile
025507510056.7% percentile
3.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.4%8.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.2%5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.4%5.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.8%, sitewide 3.3%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.4%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.5%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos