Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 387 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Impact results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Slippery Slope , Indoctrination , and Framing Effect , with Pessimism Bias as the most egregious example at 15.3% saturation with 237 hits . Analysis detected 1,206 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,548 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.1% and a BS Rank of 69% (5,273 of 16,562 topics). This Global Impact is worse (more manipulative) than 68.20% of the peer group. Global Impact
Topic details
Total words: 1,548
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 68.2% percentile 4.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 9.3% 9.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 4.3% 4.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Pessimism Bias Sitewide 1.9% Topic 15.3% 15.3% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Topic 10.1% 10.1% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 10.9% 10.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 1.0% 1.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 1.8% 1.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 15.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 15.3%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 1.7% Indoctrination: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Begging the Question: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 1.7% Composition/Division: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.2% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.8% Blind-Spot Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst