Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video54 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Global Events Impact results contain 7 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Availability Heuristic, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 37% saturation with 20 hits. Analysis detected 74 faulty-reasoning hits from 54 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 19.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠99% (252 of 16,562 topics). This Global Events Impact is worse (more manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group.
Global Events Impact
Topic details
Total words: 54
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

99% percentile
025507510098.5% percentile
19.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles54 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 37.0%37.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 37.0%37.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 18.5%18.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 11.1%11.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.1%11.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Authority: Topic 37.0%, sitewide 11.1%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 37.0%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Availability Heuristic: Topic 18.5%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 15.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos