Topic summary
⁠85%1 analyzed article/video1,540 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Glamping results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Optimism Bias, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 23.8% saturation with 1,100 hits. Analysis detected 3,137 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,192 of 16,562 topics). This Glamping is better (less manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Glamping
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 4,620
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.5% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 23.8%23.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.6%0.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 7.0%7.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Topic 23.8%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 0.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos