Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos3,344 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gilgo Beach Murders results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Ad Hominem, and Fundamental Attribution Error, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,057 hits. Analysis detected 5,092 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,699 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠8% (15,250 of 16,562 topics). This Gilgo Beach Murders is better (less manipulative) than 92.10% of the peer group.
Gilgo Beach Murders
Topic details
Total words: 11,699
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

8% percentile
02550751007.9% percentile
1.5% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.4%5.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.0%9.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.0%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos