Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,093 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gilgo Beach Killer Rex Heuermann Wife Asa Ellerup results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice , Appeal to Emotion , and Framing Effect , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 873 hits . Analysis detected 3,629 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,372 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,767 of 16,562 topics). This Gilgo Beach Killer Rex Heuermann Wife Asa Ellerup is worse (more manipulative) than 59.10% of the peer group. Gilgo Beach Killer Rex Heuermann Wife Asa Ellerup
Topic details
Total words: 4,372
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
59% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 59.1% percentile 3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 5.7% 5.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.0% 2.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.5% 2.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 11.5% 11.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 20.0%, sitewide 19.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 17.1%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.6% Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 1.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.8%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.8% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Primacy Effect: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Composition/Division: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 0.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.4% Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst