Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video711 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ghosts Of Guantanamo results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Biased Writer Voice, and Appeal to Authority, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 39.7% saturation with 1,130 hits. Analysis detected 3,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,844 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.5% and a BS Rank of 72% (4,637 of 16,562 topics). This Ghosts Of Guantanamo is worse (more manipulative) than 72.00% of the peer group.
Ghosts Of Guantanamo
Topic details
Total words: 2,844
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

72% percentile
025507510072.0% percentile
4.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 39.7%39.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 13.1%13.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 5.9%5.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 12.0%12.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 39.7%, sitewide 15.9%Framing Effect: Topic 13.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 2.0%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 2.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 1.7%Indoctrination: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos