Topic summary
⁠84%1 analyzed article/video953 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gestion Del Agua results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 333 hits. Analysis detected 3,189 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,812 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠55% (10,988 of 24,293 topics). This Gestion Del Agua is worse (more manipulative) than 54.80% of the peer group.
Gestion Del Agua
Topic details
Total words: 3,812
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

55% percentile
025507510054.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.7%8.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 8.5%8.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 6.9%6.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.4%0.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 8.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 3.7%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 1.9%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Loss Aversion: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.6%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Slippery Slope: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos