Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,497 analyzed words
BS Summary: These German Army results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Overconfidence Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 680 hits. Analysis detected 4,556 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,988 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of ⁠26% (12,404 of 16,562 topics). This German Army is better (less manipulative) than 74.90% of the peer group.
German Army
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,988
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

25% percentile
025507510025.1% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 11.4%11.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Topic 11.4%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 4.6%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Horn Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos