Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video659 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geothermal results contain 29 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 18.4% saturation with 486 hits. Analysis detected 2,762 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,636 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 62% (6,337 of 16,562 topics). This Geothermal is worse (more manipulative) than 61.70% of the peer group.
Geothermal
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,636
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

62% percentile
025507510061.7% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 8.8%8.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 2.1%2.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 18.4%18.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 12.9%12.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 9.8%9.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 5.5%5.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.9%0.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 8.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 18.4%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 4.6%Appeal to Authority: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 6.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos