Topic summary
⁠30%2 analyzed articles/videos754 analyzed words
BS Summary: These George Santos results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Special Pleading, with Self-Serving Bias as the most egregious example at 13.8% saturation with 689 hits. Analysis detected 2,526 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,980 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠31% (15,979 of 22,962 topics). This George Santos is better (less manipulative) than 69.60% of the peer group.
George Santos
Topic details
Total words: 4,980
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

30% percentile
025507510030.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score2 analyzed articles5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.2%0.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.2%0.2%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 13.8%13.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.4%0.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.1%1.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.4%1.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.7%0.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 13.8%, sitewide 3.7%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Special Pleading: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 0.3%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Begging the Question: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.7%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 1.1%Hindsight Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.4%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.4%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos