Topic summary
⁠93%1 analyzed article/video128 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Geopolitics Of Space results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Optimism Bias, and False Dilemma, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 23.7% saturation with 91 hits. Analysis detected 784 faulty-reasoning hits from 384 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 9.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (1,364 of 16,562 topics). This Geopolitics Of Space is worse (more manipulative) than 91.80% of the peer group.
Geopolitics Of Space
Topic details
Total words: 384
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

92% percentile
025507510091.8% percentile
9.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles384 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 23.7%23.7%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Topic 16.4%16.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.0%18.0%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 16.7%16.7%Status Quo BiasSitewide 2.2%Topic 10.9%10.9%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 10.2%10.2%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 8.3%8.3%Sunk Cost EffectSitewide 0.3%Topic 8.3%8.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 8.3%8.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 23.7%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.0%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Topic 16.7%, sitewide 6.0%False Dilemma: Topic 16.4%, sitewide 1.5%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 11.1%Status Quo Bias: Topic 10.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 10.2%, sitewide 1.9%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 9.6%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 9.1%Composition/Division: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.9%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 0.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 7.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos