Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Generational Trauma results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 14.4% saturation with 621 hits . Analysis detected 4,511 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,311 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 15,447 topics). This Generational Trauma is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Generational Trauma
Topic details
Total words: 4,311
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 8.6% 8.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 0.8% 0.8% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 8.0% 8.0% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.2% 1.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 4.0% 4.0% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 12.9% 12.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 0.5% 0.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 8.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 8.0%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 5.2% Optimism Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 6.0% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.3% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1% Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.7% False Dilemma: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 1.5% Loss Aversion: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst