Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video804 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Generational Politics results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Availability Heuristic, Framing Effect, and Confirmation Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 12.5% saturation with 301 hits. Analysis detected 2,273 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,412 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of 60% (6,681 of 16,562 topics). This Generational Politics is worse (more manipulative) than 59.70% of the peer group.
Generational Politics
Topic details
Total words: 2,412
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510059.7% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.2%9.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 12.5%12.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.2%1.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.5%0.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Topic 4.9%4.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.9%2.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 12.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 5.2%Recency Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 3.1%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos