Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gender Discrimination results contain 19 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 9.3% saturation with 142 hits. Analysis detected 1,017 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,527 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,559 topics). This Gender Discrimination is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gender Discrimination
Topic details
Total words: 1,527
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 4.8%4.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.1%1.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.8%0.8%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 5.1%5.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.6%5.6%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 5.2%Indoctrination: Topic 5.1%, sitewide 0.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Straw Man: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos