Topic summary
⁠55%1 analyzed article/video855 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gender Differences results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Hasty Generalization, and Confirmation Bias, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 15.8% saturation with 406 hits. Analysis detected 2,264 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,565 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.2% and a BS Rank of ⁠70% (5,098 of 16,562 topics). This Gender Differences is worse (more manipulative) than 69.20% of the peer group.
Gender Differences
Topic details
Total words: 2,565
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

69% percentile
025507510069.2% percentile
4.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.0%6.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.4%4.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 15.8%15.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.5%2.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 10.1%10.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.8%6.8%Representativeness Heuris…Sitewide 1.9%Topic 4.3%4.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 2.5%2.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 15.9%Anecdotal: Topic 15.8%, sitewide 5.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.6%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 4.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.1%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1%Indoctrination: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 0.0%Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos