Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video727 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gaza Israel Journalists Coverage Access War Zone results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 19% saturation with 553 hits. Analysis detected 2,764 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,908 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠61% (6,596 of 16,562 topics). This Gaza Israel Journalists Coverage Access War Zone is worse (more manipulative) than 60.20% of the peer group.
Gaza Israel Journalists Coverage Access War Zone
Topic details
Total words: 2,908
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

60% percentile
025507510060.2% percentile
3.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 12.0%12.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.3%0.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 3.2%3.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 2.1%2.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 2.5%2.5%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Topic 0.1%0.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 2.1%2.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 12.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 19.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 13.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 9.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.2%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Recency Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos