Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video2,167 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gay Life results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Self-Serving Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 5.5% saturation with 359 hits. Analysis detected 3,589 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,501 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠10% (14,922 of 16,562 topics). This Gay Life is better (less manipulative) than 90.10% of the peer group.
Gay Life
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,501
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

10% percentile
02550751009.9% percentile
1.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.1%0.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.6%0.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.5%1.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 2.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos