Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,527 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Gangs results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Out-Group Homogeneity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Hasty Generalization, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 675 hits. Analysis detected 4,782 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,576 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠33% (11,118 of 16,562 topics). This Gangs is better (less manipulative) than 67.10% of the peer group.
Gangs
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 6,576
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

33% percentile
025507510032.9% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.9%0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Topic 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.6%1.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.8%4.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 11.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 3.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos