Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Gaming Performance results contain 12 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Anchoring Bias, and Overconfidence Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.4% saturation with 315 hits. Analysis detected 897 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,015 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Gaming Performance is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Gaming Performance
Topic details
Total words: 3,015
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 10.4%10.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 2.2%2.2%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 4.0%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 1.4%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos