Topic summary
84%3 analyzed articles/videos488 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Game Of Thrones results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Halo Effect, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 38.9% saturation with 3,049 hits. Analysis detected 10,787 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,837 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 59% (6,806 of 16,562 topics). This Game Of Thrones is worse (more manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Game Of Thrones
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,837
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

59% percentile
025507510058.9% percentile
3.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles7.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 38.9%38.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.3%6.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 11.1%11.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Topic 6.4%6.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 10.8%10.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.7%3.7%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 38.9%, sitewide 5.3%Framing Effect: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 11.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 10.8%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Hindsight Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.4%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 3.3%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%False Dilemma: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 2.5%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos