Topic summary
⁠0%2 analyzed articles/videos530 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Future Of Marketing results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Overconfidence Bias, and Biased Writer Voice, with Attempt to Sell a Product or Service as the most egregious example at 29.2% saturation with 1,069 hits. Analysis detected 6,957 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,662 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 5% and a BS Rank of ⁠76% (4,014 of 16,562 topics). This Future Of Marketing is worse (more manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Future Of Marketing
Topic details
Total words: 3,662
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

76% percentile
025507510075.8% percentile
5.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 29.2%29.2%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.4%9.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 19.4%19.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 2.4%2.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.0%6.0%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 20.4%20.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 10.1%10.1%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.5%10.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 29.2%, sitewide 0.5%Framing Effect: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 8.1%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 19.4%, sitewide 4.6%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.5%, sitewide 5.3%Indoctrination: Topic 10.1%, sitewide 0.0%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 1.5%Optimism Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 6.0%Begging the Question: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or ServiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos