Topic summary
⁠29%1 analyzed article/video1,122 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Future Of Grading results contain 17 faulty reasoning types, including Overconfidence Bias, Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, and Hasty Generalization, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 17.2% saturation with 770 hits. Analysis detected 1,830 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,488 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠49% (11,968 of 23,392 topics). This Future Of Grading is better (less manipulative) than 51.20% of the peer group.
Future Of Grading
Topic details
Total words: 4,488
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

49% percentile
025507510048.8% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 17.2%17.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 0.7%0.7%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 1.3%1.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Optimism Bias: Topic 17.2%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 5.2%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 0.5%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 1.5%Middle Ground: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.1%Special Pleading: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.3%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos