Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Future Of Cities results contain 23 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Confirmation Bias , and Overconfidence Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.1% saturation with 819 hits . Analysis detected 4,603 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,574 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Future Of Cities is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Future Of Cities
Topic details
Total words: 11,574
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 6.6% 6.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 2.4% 2.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Topic 0.9% 0.9% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Topic 4.8% 4.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.1%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 5.3% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3% Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 2.0% Pessimism Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% False Dilemma: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 1.5% Genetic Fallacy: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.4% Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4% Straw Man: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.9% Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 0.0% Appeal to Nature: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst