Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Future Of AI results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 874 hits . Analysis detected 7,739 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,660 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 16,558 topics). This Future Of AI is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Future Of AI
Topic details
Total words: 9,660
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 1.6% 1.6% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Topic 1.9% 1.9% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Topic 9.1% 9.1% Straw Man Sitewide 0.9% Topic 5.3% 5.3% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Topic 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1% Overconfidence Bias: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 4.6% Hasty Generalization: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Topic 5.6%, sitewide 5.2% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 5.3% Straw Man: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.9% False Dilemma: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2% Burden of Proof: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 0.4% Slippery Slope: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.7% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst