Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,341 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fusion Centers results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Unattributed Quote, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 17.9% saturation with 961 hits. Analysis detected 5,493 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,364 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of ⁠51% (8,125 of 16,562 topics). This Fusion Centers is worse (more manipulative) than 50.90% of the peer group.
Fusion Centers
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,364
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

51% percentile
025507510050.9% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.9%4.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.7%1.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.0%5.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.4%3.4%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.3%11.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 5.2%5.2%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 5.6%5.6%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 17.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 7.5%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 5.6%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 1.7%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 2.0%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Pessimism Bias: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos