Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video604 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Funerals results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, In-Group Bias, and Framing Effect, with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 11.3% saturation with 274 hits. Analysis detected 1,709 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 45% (9,182 of 16,562 topics). This Funerals is better (less manipulative) than 55.40% of the peer group.
Funerals
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 2,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.6% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.0%7.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.1%2.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.4%1.4%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.9%0.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.3%11.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.5%3.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Indoctrination: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos