Topic summary
⁠5%1 analyzed article/video1,681 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fundraisers results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service, Appeal to Emotion, and False Dilemma, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 6.8% saturation with 459 hits. Analysis detected 1,766 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,724 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (21,938 of 22,919 topics). This Fundraisers is better (less manipulative) than 95.70% of the peer group.
Fundraisers
Topic details
Total words: 6,724
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

4% percentile
02550751004.3% percentile
1.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 0.4%0.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.0%1.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.8%4.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%5%5%10%10%15%15%20%20%25%25%Negativity Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 0.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 0.1%, sitewide 0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos