Topic summary
⁠48%1 analyzed article/video455 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fuel Quality results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 9.5% saturation with 173 hits. Analysis detected 1,820 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,820 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠65% (5,804 of 16,562 topics). This Fuel Quality is worse (more manipulative) than 65.00% of the peer group.
Fuel Quality
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,820
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

65% percentile
025507510065.0% percentile
3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.3%9.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 0.8%0.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 5.7%5.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 5.3%5.3%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.4%4.4%Composition/DivisionSitewide 0.2%Topic 4.2%4.2%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.8%1.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 5.7%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 6.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 9.5%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 8.1%, sitewide 5.3%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 5.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anecdotal: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 4.8%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Topic 4.4%, sitewide 0.0%Composition/Division: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Begging the Question: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.5%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos