Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video405 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Friedrich Merz results contain 21 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Framing Effect, and Anecdotal, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 330 hits. Analysis detected 1,887 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,620 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠79% (3,310 of 15,754 topics). This Friedrich Merz is worse (more manipulative) than 79.00% of the peer group.
Friedrich Merz
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,620
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

79% percentile
025507510079.0% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.5%1.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 18.3%18.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 14.0%14.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 3.2%3.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Topic 4.2%4.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.8%4.8%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 5.8%5.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 9.0%9.0%Red HerringSitewide 0.7%Topic 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 14.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.4%, sitewide 19.2%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 18.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Topic 9.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 5.8%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.8%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.0%Red Herring: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.1%, sitewide 3.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 1.1%Recency Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos