Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Frederick Douglass results contain 48 faulty reasoning types, including Indoctrination, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Authority, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 870 hits. Analysis detected 10,082 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,969 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 15,765 topics). This Frederick Douglass is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Frederick Douglass
Topic details
Total words: 9,969
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles10K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.5%2.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Topic 7.8%7.8%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.5%1.5%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.1%6.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.0%3.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 8.7%, sitewide 8.1%Indoctrination: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 0.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 3.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.5%, sitewide 4.6%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 3.1%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 3.8%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.0%Begging the Question: Topic 3.3%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.8%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 0.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos