Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Fox Sports results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 31.5% saturation with 2,214 hits. Analysis detected 13,420 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,032 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,562 topics). This Fox Sports is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Fox Sports
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 7,032
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 31.5%31.5%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Topic 27.9%27.9%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 6.8%6.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 15.4%15.4%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Topic 7.5%7.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 4.1%4.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 3.2%3.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 11.8%11.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.3%0.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 31.5%, sitewide 5.3%Ad Hominem: Topic 27.9%, sitewide 2.2%Framing Effect: Topic 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 20.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 11.8%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 15.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Halo Effect: Topic 9.3%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 7.5%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 2.0%In-Group Bias: Topic 5.0%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 5.2%False Dilemma: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 1.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.4%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Straw Man: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 2.8%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos