Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,960 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fossil Fuel Phase Out results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 9.7% saturation with 568 hits. Analysis detected 3,909 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,880 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (13,812 of 16,562 topics). This Fossil Fuel Phase Out is better (less manipulative) than 83.40% of the peer group.
Fossil Fuel Phase Out
Topic details
Total words: 5,880
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510016.6% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 9.1%9.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 6.1%6.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 5.2%5.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.6%2.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 0.7%0.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.1%2.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 9.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 6.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 9.7%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 4.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Topic 2.6%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Topic 3.6%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos