Topic summary
⁠51%1 analyzed article/video1,916 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foss results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 13.4% saturation with 771 hits. Analysis detected 4,678 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,748 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.4% and a BS Rank of ⁠37% (10,557 of 16,562 topics). This Foss is better (less manipulative) than 63.70% of the peer group.
Foss
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 5,748
Article count: 1
Authors
?

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

36% percentile
025507510036.3% percentile
2.4% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 3.7%3.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 8.2%8.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 1.9%1.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 13.4%13.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 10.4%10.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.9%1.9%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Topic 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 8.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Topic 13.4%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 10.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.3%, sitewide 3.3%Indoctrination: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.4%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 0.7%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos