Topic summary
⁠14%1 analyzed article/video233 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Fort Lauderdale results contain 8 faulty reasoning types, including Unattributed Quote, Post Hoc (False Cause), and Recency Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 12.9% saturation with 90 hits. Analysis detected 242 faulty-reasoning hits from 699 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠71% (4,865 of 16,562 topics). This Fort Lauderdale is worse (more manipulative) than 70.60% of the peer group.
Fort Lauderdale
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 699
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

71% percentile
025507510070.6% percentile
4.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles699 analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 2.3%2.3%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.4%2.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.3%2.3%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 12.9%12.9%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 5.3%5.3%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 4.6%4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 1.9%1.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Topic 3.0%3.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 12.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Unattributed Quote: Topic 5.3%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 4.6%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos