Topic summary
⁠63%3 analyzed articles/videos1,314 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Relations results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Biased Writer Voice, and Unattributed Quote, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 340 hits. Analysis detected 4,531 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,596 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.6% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (9,639 of 16,562 topics). This Foreign Relations is better (less manipulative) than 58.20% of the peer group.
Foreign Relations
Topic details
Total words: 4,596
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

42% percentile
025507510041.8% percentile
2.6% BS Score3 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 7.4%7.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Topic 1.3%1.3%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Topic 6.4%6.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 6.0%6.0%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Topic 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 6.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 6.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Topic 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 0.5%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Red Herring: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 0.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 0.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Ad Hominem: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos