Topic summary
0%1 analyzed article/video819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Policy Impact results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause), Availability Heuristic, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 843 hits. Analysis detected 4,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,423 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 85% (2,567 of 16,562 topics). This Foreign Policy Impact is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group.
Foreign Policy Impact
Topic details
Total words: 2,423
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

85% percentile
025507510084.5% percentile
6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Topic 29.0%29.0%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 7.8%7.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 34.8%34.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 3.4%3.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 13.0%13.0%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 3.7%3.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 14.4%14.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 2.9%2.9%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Topic 5.2%5.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Topic 34.8%, sitewide 19.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 29.0%, sitewide 3.3%Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 9.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7%Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.0%Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2%Slippery Slope: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.7%Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Horn Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.6%Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7%Negativity BiasSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos