Topic summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 819 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign Policy Impact results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Availability Heuristic , and Biased Writer Voice , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 34.8% saturation with 843 hits . Analysis detected 4,015 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,423 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.6% and a BS Rank of 85% (2,567 of 16,562 topics). This Foreign Policy Impact is worse (more manipulative) than 84.50% of the peer group. Foreign Policy Impact
Topic details
Total words: 2,423
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed topics
85% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 84.5% percentile 6.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Topic SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Topic 29.0% 29.0% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Topic 7.8% 7.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Topic 34.8% 34.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Topic 3.4% 3.4% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Topic 13.0% 13.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Topic 3.7% 3.7% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Topic 14.4% 14.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Topic 1.3% 1.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Topic 2.9% 2.9% Slippery Slope Sitewide 1.7% Topic 5.2% 5.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Negativity Bias: Topic 34.8%, sitewide 19.2% Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 29.0%, sitewide 3.3% Framing Effect: Topic 7.8%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 15.9% Availability Heuristic: Topic 14.4%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Topic 13.0%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 11.1% Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.0%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Topic 6.5%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anchoring Bias: Topic 6.4%, sitewide 4.0% Anecdotal: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Topic 5.2%, sitewide 1.7% Pessimism Bias: Topic 4.6%, sitewide 1.9% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.0% Recency Bias: Topic 4.5%, sitewide 2.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.7%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 2.2% Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4% Horn Effect: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.9% Primacy Effect: Topic 1.1%, sitewide 0.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 0.9%, sitewide 0.6% Red Herring: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 0.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide rate Topic rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst