Topic summary
⁠74%1 analyzed article/video1,425 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreign & Public Diplomacy results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Confirmation Bias, and Pessimism Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.3% saturation with 440 hits. Analysis detected 3,502 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,275 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of ⁠45% (9,144 of 16,562 topics). This Foreign & Public Diplomacy is better (less manipulative) than 55.20% of the peer group.
Foreign & Public Diplomacy
Topic details
Total words: 4,275
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

45% percentile
025507510044.8% percentile
2.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 1.8%1.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.2%1.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 10.3%10.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 9.4%9.4%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Topic 5.5%5.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Topic 4.3%4.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 10.3%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 9.4%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 7.5%, sitewide 7.5%Pessimism Bias: Topic 5.5%, sitewide 1.9%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 4.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 4.3%, sitewide 0.8%Anchoring Bias: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 4.0%False Dilemma: Topic 3.4%, sitewide 1.5%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.5%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 2.7%Burden of Proof: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 0.4%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 2.2%Actor-Observer Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.6%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 1.1%Circular Reasoning: Topic 1.8%, sitewide 0.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos