Topic summary
⁠15%1 analyzed article/video505 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Foreclosure Tax results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Bandwagon, and Representativeness Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.9% saturation with 119 hits. Analysis detected 921 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,020 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠18% (13,622 of 16,496 topics). This Foreclosure Tax is better (less manipulative) than 82.60% of the peer group.
Foreclosure Tax
Topic ranking list
PercentileTopicBS Score
⁠0%Uber1%
⁠0%Pittsburgh Pirates1%
⁠0%Opera1%
⁠0%Holocaust1%
⁠0%Privacy Policy1%
⁠18%Foreclosure Tax (selected)2%
⁠100%Radio Roundup / Week In Review60%
⁠100%E-Bikes / Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%E Bikes Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%The Last Word With Lawrence Odonnell69%
Topic details
Total words: 2,020
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

17% percentile
025507510017.4% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 5.9%5.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Topic 4.1%4.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Topic 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 1.4%1.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 1.7%1.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 2.3%2.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 1.6%1.6%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 0.3%0.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Topic 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 5.9%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Topic 1.4%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Topic 1.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Topic 1.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Topic 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Bandwagon: Topic 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Topic 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 2.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Topic 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Topic 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Red Herring: Topic 1.9%, sitewide 0.7%Begging the Question: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 0.6%, sitewide 1.4%Sunk Cost Effect: Topic 1.3%, sitewide 0.3%Unattributed Quote: Topic 1.0%, sitewide 1.1%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos