Topic summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ford Racing results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Self-Serving Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 23.3% saturation with 321 hits. Analysis detected 1,881 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,380 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 16,225 topics). This Ford Racing is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Ford Racing
Topic ranking list
Topic details
Total words: 1,380
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed topics

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

TopicSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Topic 4.7%4.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Topic 23.3%23.3%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Topic 15.6%15.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Topic 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Topic 2.9%2.9%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Topic 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Topic 3.2%3.2%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Topic 4.2%4.2%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Topic 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Topic 11.2%11.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Topic 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Topic 23.3%, sitewide 5.3%Appeal to Emotion: Topic 17.8%, sitewide 15.9%Self-Serving Bias: Topic 15.6%, sitewide 3.7%Hasty Generalization: Topic 11.2%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Topic 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Topic 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Optimism Bias: Topic 8.3%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Topic 4.2%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Topic 7.3%, sitewide 4.6%Halo Effect: Topic 3.2%, sitewide 6.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Topic 6.4%, sitewide 3.3%Anecdotal: Topic 1.5%, sitewide 5.2%Primacy Effect: Topic 4.1%, sitewide 0.9%Anchoring Bias: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Topic 3.1%, sitewide 0.8%Status Quo Bias: Topic 3.0%, sitewide 2.2%Unattributed Quote: Topic 2.4%, sitewide 1.1%Bandwagon: Topic 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Topic 2.2%, sitewide 1.7%Hindsight Bias: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 1.4%Quote-first Misdirection: Topic 2.1%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 0.5%False Dilemma: Topic 2.0%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateTopic rate

Analyzed articles and videos